Do Americans think Gun control is a steady hand ??

Don't start me off!


you know what happens when you start talking about Americans?Do Americans think Gun control is a steady hand ??
lol...I know I do !!Do Americans think Gun control is a steady hand ??
Idaho Mike: Have you seen the gun murder rates in your country? In Britain it still makes front page news when someone here get's shot, as we aren't aloud to have them. Why don't you check out our murder rates, which do you think is the better solution? In America to make the front page news you have to be a serial killer with a new and interesting way of wearing your victims head as a hat!!!
you bet!!! Use both hands for better results.
Oh man that is good i love it. and to some americans YEAH, but they just don't have it in them to respect the results of unrestricted gun use
Chris Rock said it best. Guns don't kill anyone. Its bullet control u need! Sell them at $500 a bullett see how trigger happy people are. See how much u really wanna shoot someone - work two jobs, cut out luxuries, save up... thats a real 'cooling off' period..
No u can not control from guns but control by hearts of people,o.k. luv is the key of contol.
A cool head and a steady hand....... A people who are denied the ability to defend themselves are called slaves...
I personally think being able to follow a target with a steady hand is better then what Sarah Brady calls herself.





:D





My SKS, 12 ga Mossberg, H%26amp;R 30.06 AR15,Walther P22 and S%26amp;W99 have killed less people then Teddy Kennedy's car. But they do burn up the prairie dogs, coyotes, deer, and paper
I can't speak for every one but i believe gun control is hitting your target one shot one hit one Kill
Nothing wrong with guns, so long as the bad guys get shot.[CE]
gun control is like speech control-unconstitutional
funny...but so true
No way, we have the right to bear arms and I will no matter what.
Gun control does not work in Canada and criminals have more guns then ever. Canadians can't own firearms without filling in tons of paperwork and costing you fortunate and you have no right of any kind . On top of it all , it cost Canada goverment billions dollars which in turn is taxpayers money .
i wish that was all there was to our gun laws, but unfortunately, such is not the case. there are many laws passed under the guise of gun control that are at best silly and at worst, quite dangerous. our constitution calls for the right to keep and bear arms, however, there is nothing preventing an abundance of legislation surrounding those rights. take for an example the recently deceased ';assault weapons ban';, signed into law by former president clinton, and blessedly allowed to expire by the current president bush. most people aren't even aware of the fact that there is no class of firearm called ';assault weapons';, rather many separate characteristics and qualities of many different firearms were hand-picked to be included in this ban. things like pistol grips on non-pistols, and the ability to be shot in a fully-automatic capacity were selected to be banned, supposedly to decrease crime rates, which, coincidentally, dropped by i think at least twenty-some percent only AFTER the ban was allowed to expire. the ban itself saw no decrease whatsoever in any rate of crime, because crimes, for the most part, were not being committed by the types of weapons that were banned. but people liked the sound of banning ';assault weapons';, especially with catch phrases like ';drive-by shooting'; being so popular when it was originally enacted. that's what happens when people who don't know about guns create gun laws. that is an example of the sillier side of our gun laws. things like not being allowed to carry a legally concealed weapon into places where violent crime is most likely to occur, like banks, courtrooms, and schools, show the more dangerous side to gun legislation. bad people are going to find a way to get guns into places like that, but the upright citizens have to hand theirs over at the door, because to break even one small part of the laws regarding carrying a firearm means to forever lose the right to do so again, at least legally. we are stuck. how do we protect ourselves when our protection is routinely being forced to be left behind? ';the police!'; is most non-carrying folks' answer. ';let the police protect you.'; to them i say this: the police are not required by law to protect you. it's true--look it up. if a cop sees a situation happening or about to happen, and he decides, for any number of legal reasons at his disposal, not to interfere, then you are left to protect yourself. but i digress. a steady hand is about the only gun legislation the true citizens of this country need, but with all the anti-gun cry-babies that pass for such a great number of the adult population here, we are for now saddled with way more laws pertaining to gun ownership than could ever be necessary.